Archive

July 5, 2026

Browsing

The chip that could make or break Wall Street’s confidence in artificial intelligence no longer lives inside a flashy graphics processor.

Increasingly, it sits inside a memory module, and it is made by a company that started life in a Boise, Idaho, dental office basement in 1978.

For most of its four-decade existence, Micron Technology was the kind of stock serious investors avoided.

Memory chips, dynamic random-access memory, or DRAM, and its derivatives were a commodity.

The business ran in brutal cycles: a shortage would lift prices and profits, manufacturers would race to add capacity, supply would overshoot demand, prices would collapse, and the cycle would repeat.

MU was a trade, not an investment. Wall Street treated it accordingly. That story is being rewritten at speed.

Over the past year, Micron’s shares have surged roughly 700%, with 200% of those gains arriving in 2026 alone.

Last month, the company crossed a $1 trillion market capitalisation for the first time.

Its latest quarterly earnings delivered a 346% surge in revenue and gross margins of 84.9% surpassing, remarkably, those of Nvidia.

And in a stretch when AI and technology stocks were nursing heavy losses after questions over bubble-territory valuations began circulating on Wall Street, it was Micron’s blowout results that steadied nerves and reignited confidence that the AI trade still has runway.

Two years ago, that role belonged to Nvidia.

The question investors are now asking is whether it has quietly passed the baton.

How Nvidia wrote the bellwether playbook

To understand what Micron may be becoming, it helps to understand what Nvidia became.

In November 2022, when OpenAI launched ChatGPT and set off the current AI frenzy, Nvidia’s graphics processing units, originally designed for computer games, found themselves identified as the workhorses for training AI models.

Demand exploded. Between its October 2022 low and June 2024, Nvidia’s shares surged approximately 1,100%.

By mid-2024, it had briefly become the world’s most valuable company, with a market capitalisation of $3.34 trillion, and had joined the select grouping of mega-cap technology companies known as the Magnificent Seven alongside Alphabet, Meta, and others.

But Nvidia’s significance went beyond its own price. It became a barometer.

Investors read Nvidia’s earnings reports the way they read blockbuster economic releases, not just for what they said about one company, but for what they implied about the pace and health of the entire AI buildout.

Even when Nvidia itself traded flat after reporting, its supply chain partners, Taiwan Semiconductor, SK Hynix, and ASML, would often move sharply in anticipation or in the immediate aftermath of its numbers.

“It’s not just a single stock,” Arun Sai, multi-asset portfolio manager at Pictet Asset Management, told the Financial Times last year.

“It’s very unusual for people to read through it to the economy as a whole.” That power has not vanished.

In its latest first-quarter results, Nvidia posted revenue of $81.6 billion, up 85% on the year, while net income more than tripled to $58.3 billion.

Those are not the numbers of a company in decline.

But its shares fell 1.6% in after-hours trading following the release.

The market has become accustomed to Nvidia delivering stellar figures and was pricing in something closer to perfection.

Year to date, Nvidia’s shares have risen a modest 3%.

Over the past 12 months, the gain is approximately 22%, a respectable figure for most companies, but underwhelming by the standards of what the market has come to expect.

The Nvidia era of market-moving earnings is not over; it has simply become less dramatic.

How scarcity of memory birthed the Micron of today

Micron’s rise as a new bellwether flows from a structural shift in what AI actually needs to run.

Modern AI systems require enormous amounts of data positioned directly alongside the processors crunching it.

That makes memory, specifically high-bandwidth memory, or HBM, one of the scarcest and most valuable components in an AI server.

Without enough of it, even the fastest GPU becomes a bottleneck.

As that realisation spread through 2025, Micron stopped being valued as a commodity memory producer and began being treated as a strategic supplier to the AI ecosystem.

Only three companies in the world can manufacture HBM at scale: Micron, South Korea’s Samsung, and SK Hynix.

That oligopoly, combined with the surge in AI-related demand, has produced something unfamiliar for the memory industry: sustained pricing power.

Micron’s gross margins in its latest quarter stood at 84.9%, up from 74.9% the prior period and from just 39% a year earlier.

The company expects the HBM market it serves to grow to approximately $100 billion by 2028.

Where large technology companies once faced what commentators called an “Nvidia tax”, paying a premium for indispensable chips, some now speak of a “Micron tax,” a memory toll that hyperscalers and AI infrastructure builders simply have to absorb.

Apple has been an example on that front after it had to raise the prices of its devices due to surging memory costs.

How Micron stabilised markets

The significance of Micron’s new role crystallised earlier this month.

Markets had been rattled by concerns that AI spending was outpacing any near-term revenue visibility.

SpaceX’s $25 billion bond sale, arriving so soon after its IPO, led investors to wonder if Wall Street might be entering AI bubble territory.

Ludovic Subran, chief investment officer of Germany’s Allianz, which manages €800 billion in assets, warned that markets may be shifting from “a healthy boom, a stretched boom into bubble territory.”

AI and technology stocks sold off sharply.

Then Micron reported that revenue surged 346% for the quarter.

Profit came in at $28.2 billion, almost 15 times the figure posted in the same quarter a year earlier.

The company blew past analyst expectations on every key metric, sending its stock nearly 16% higher in after-hours trading.

The results did not just lift Micron.

They stabilised the broader AI trade.

Investors took them as confirmation that the demand underpinning the entire AI infrastructure buildout, however stretched valuations may have remained real and accelerated.

A cautionary tale, and what Micron is doing about it

Nvidia’s trajectory does, however, offer a warning.

Its dominant position in AI chips, once a near-monopoly, is under pressure.

OpenAI has unveiled a custom AI chip developed with Broadcom.

Qualcomm has struck supply deals with Microsoft and Meta.

Competition is arriving from several directions simultaneously.

Micron’s shareholders would do well to hold that lesson in mind.

The more immediate risk is the one built into memory’s DNA.

Micron’s latest revenue surge was driven substantially by dramatically higher prices, margins of 85% compared to 38% a year ago, telling that story plainly.

Nvidia’s 85% revenue growth, by contrast, is not similarly dependent on elevated pricing.

As analyst David Jagielski of The Motley Fool has noted, if demand were to slow or if memory supply were to catch up with demand, Micron’s valuation, which has risen sharply over the past year, would face a steep correction.

Micron’s management is aware of the history and is attempting to break it.

The company is pursuing long-term supply contracts that lock customers in and reduce exposure to spot-market pricing swings.

CEO Sanjay Mehrotra has argued that the supply crunch is structurally different this time, as new semiconductor fabrication plants take years to build, and next-generation memory has become significantly more complex to manufacture, meaning capacity cannot be added quickly enough to produce the oversupply gluts of previous cycles.

To back that argument, Micron is investing approximately $200 billion in manufacturing and research and development, including new memory fabrication plants in Boise, Idaho, and Syracuse, New York.

Whether Micron can hold Nvidia’s former position as Wall Street’s preferred instrument for reading the AI boom will depend on whether those structural arguments prove correct.

For now, the market has decided that the most important number in AI is not measured in teraflops. It is measured in gigabytes.

The post From a dental office basement to a trillion dollars: Is Micron the next Nvidia? appeared first on Invezz

The artificial intelligence boom has a people problem, and it is getting worse faster than most investors have noticed.

While Wall Street has spent the better part of three years fixating on chip stocks, hyperscaler spending, and the relentless march of AI valuations, a less glamorous drama has been unfolding in suburban town halls, county commission meetings, and online petitions from New Jersey to Michigan.

Ordinary Americans, armed with electricity bills, noise complaints, and a generalised anxiety about what artificial intelligence is doing to their lives, are pushing back against the physical infrastructure of the AI boom — and they are beginning to win.

In the first quarter of 2026, 75 data-centre projects worth a combined $130 billion were blocked or delayed by local opposition, according to Data Center Watch, a research firm backed by AI security company 10a Labs.

That is as many projects as faced that fate across the entirety of 2025.

The pace of resistance is accelerating precisely as the pace of construction is accelerating, creating a collision that the industry has been slow to take seriously.

Why communities are saying no

The grievances are varied, but they cluster around a handful of recurring concerns.

Power consumption sits at the top. Between 2018 and 2023, the share of total US electricity consumption represented by data centres rose from 1.9% to 4.4%, according to a study published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

Projections for what comes next are stark: by the end of the decade, national average wholesale electricity costs could rise between 6% and 29%, with the increase driven primarily by data-centre expansion.

In Virginia, one of the epicentres of the country’s data-centre boom, electricity generation costs could spike by as much as 57%.

Water usage is a second flashpoint.

Data centres use enormous volumes of water for cooling, and in communities already managing drought risk or ageing infrastructure, the addition of a facility consuming millions of gallons annually is not an abstraction.

Residents have also cited the constant low-frequency hum emitted by large facilities, which critics argue could fundamentally alter the character of surrounding neighbourhoods and pose health concerns with prolonged exposure.

Then there is something harder to quantify but no less real.

A general psychological resistance to artificial intelligence has fused with the more concrete grievances, giving the movement an ideological dimension that purely economic arguments cannot easily address.

About 44% of Americans now oppose data-centre construction in the United States, against just 21% who support it, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in June.

The gap widens sharply when the question becomes personal: asked whether they would support a data centre in their own community, 57% said no, while only 14% said yes.

“Something that has changed right now is that now we have people that are against data centres even though they don’t have a data centre in their backyard, because they see data centres as the embodiment of AI,” Miquel Vila, lead analyst at Data Center Watch, told Fortune.

“What they oppose is AI. They consider that stopping data centres is the way to stop AI development.”

Why Wall Street is beginning to pay attention to the protests

To appreciate why the financial stakes are significant, it helps to understand how thoroughly the data-centre buildout has underpinned the broader economy and equity markets.

Morgan Stanley estimates that hyperscalers like Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and others will spend $800 billion on capital expenditures in 2026 — roughly the same amount that all non-technology S&P 500 companies combined spent on capex in 2025.

The Semiconductor Industry Association projects that government and industry will spend a further $4 trillion on data-centre infrastructure through 2028.

Data-centre construction spending has already topped $50 billion in a single month, surpassing total US public spending on transportation infrastructure including airports and subways, as Bloomberg reported.

AI enthusiasm has been almost entirely responsible for the S&P 500’s 84% rise since ChatGPT’s public launch in November 2022.

Goldman Sachs expects the AI investment theme to account for roughly half of all earnings growth over the next two years.

The lofty valuations of companies across the AI supply chain rest, to a significant degree, on the assumption that planned capacity will materialise.

A large portion of it may not.

“A lot of the commitments and the build-out of data centers where it’s easy has kind of been done, so you’re getting marginally more difficult,” said Todd Castagno, a managing director at Morgan Stanley in a New York Times report.

“From a markets perspective, expectations might be, maybe not reset, but realigned with the fact that it’s hard to put a couple trillion dollars in the ground in a short time.”

Cities including Tulsa, New Orleans, Birmingham and Ypsilanti Township in Michigan have implemented temporary bans on permitting or construction, as have dozens of other counties and towns, according to a database maintained by hedge fund Interconnected Capital.

Democrats and Republicans in 14 states have proposed construction pauses.

Maine’s legislature passed a temporary statewide moratorium in April, though it was subsequently vetoed by Governor Janet Mills.

Why the tech industry’s charm offensive may not be enough

The technology industry has responded with a concerted public relations effort.

Late last year, Meta spent more than $6 million on an advertising campaign across eight states and Washington DC, promoting the economic benefits of data centres to local communities.

OpenAI and Microsoft have publicly pledged to absorb the energy costs their facilities generate, a gesture aimed at defusing consumer anxiety about rising electricity bills.

Nvidia, Amazon, and Google have each announced technological advances they claim will significantly reduce data-centre water consumption.

Whether any of this is sufficient is genuinely unclear.

“The AI boom is fast approaching a moment of truth, as rapid growth and soaring valuations collide with ballooning capital expenditure, a public backlash and the challenges of real-life adoption,” Deutsche Bank analyst Cox wrote in a recent report.

The resistance, as Vila and others have noted, is no longer purely local.

It has taken on the character of a broader social movement, and social movements are not easily neutralised by folksy advertising.

Analysts debate magnitude of risk to AI-related stocks

For investors, the distribution of risk matters as much as its existence.

“Data-centre opposition is more of an emerging risk than an immediate pressure on AI-related stocks,” Gil Luria, head of technology research at DA Davidson, said in a Barron’s report.

The largest hyperscalers — Microsoft, Google, Amazon — have global footprints and enough redundancy to route investment around hostile localities. They are inconvenienced, not threatened.

The same cannot be said for smaller operators dependent on a handful of large projects.

“The smaller AI clouds are small enough, and have projects that are big enough, that losing a few projects is material,” Luria says.

CoreWeave, for instance, is facing organised resistance to a proposed facility in Kenilworth, New Jersey, that would draw 250 megawatts of electrical capacity — roughly a quarter of the company’s active capacity today.

An online petition calling for the project’s cancellation has gathered more than 11,000 signatures.

Logan Purk, a technology industry analyst at Edward Jones, believes that already extended construction timelines will lengthen further, ultimately reducing the total amount of capacity built.

The ripple effects would travel up the supply chain. “I do think the difficulty is not fully baked in,” Purk said in a New York Times report.

“If we assume tomorrow that data-centre construction stops because there’s no access to new power, the ripple effects across the semiconductor industry would be pretty substantial.”

The picks-and-shovels companies — the equipment and infrastructure suppliers whose fortunes are pegged to the volume of construction — are the most directly exposed.

The resistance might also create some winners

The backlash, however, is not without its beneficiaries.

Mark Guberti of The Motley Fool argues that operators who already have data centres built and generating revenue are quietly positioned to benefit.

“The presence of fewer data centers helps these companies charge higher prices for their AI infrastructure,” he says.

Among the names he points to are Iren and Terawulf, both of which have operational sites and a revenue base that a construction freeze would only make more valuable.

Edge data centres represent a separate category of potential winner.

“These types of data centers are much smaller than large-scale AI data centers that eat up multiple gigawatts of energy,” Guberti says.

“Protesters are less likely to rally against these types of data centers, and zoning requirements for them are less complex.”

These facilities consume far less power and water, present a significantly smaller target for organised opposition, and are considerably less likely to trigger the kind of community mobilisation that is stalling larger projects.

One Stop Solutions, which designs the hardware that forms the backbone of edge data-centre sites, is among the companies analysts have identified as a direct beneficiary of that shift.

Honeywell offers exposure to the same theme through its building automation division.

The business grew 8% year over year in the fourth quarter and accounted for roughly a fifth of the company’s total sales.

However, Honeywell is diversified across multiple industrial businesses, making it a less concentrated play on the edge data-centre theme than One Stop Solutions, which carries more risk but offers purer exposure for investors seeking growth.

The post Americans' revolt against data centers is growing: how it could disrupt the AI trade appeared first on Invezz